Whether defending against common malware or some determined Nation State, being able to proactively detect attacks and changes in the organization are required. The past year I spent a large amount of time helping several organizations setup and put in place the right people, processes, and technology to help defend against increasing security threats. Although many organizations spend millions of dollars on technology and hire staff to monitor security 24/7 the organizations were still lacking two fundamental items.
The people although good at monitoring lacked the attack and threat mind set. The staff was not able to figure out when an actual attack was happening.
Second the organizations lacked the basic security operations processes required to keep track and make appropriate use of the vast amounts of data.
As a result I spent the past few months developing a whitepaper that specifically addresses the primary components of a SOC, which can be used to help organizations setup a centralized core and embark on developing the correct operational processes. Although I don’t address item number one above, this paper explains in detail the following.
Defining the SOC
Determining the Processes
Understanding the Environment that needs protected
There has been a large amount of security information and recent attacks posted in the media. We have Mandiant’s report on China as well as several issues concerning Java. The pure volume of information over the past year has made it difficult to keep up without a combination sources. As a result InfoSecAlways has done a few modifications to the site. Please check out the new “Security Feeds” in the right column (4th Block Down). This is a combination of about 20 different security RSS feeds piping into the blog now. You can check the site daily to get the latest news and updates in the industry.
Also, check out the links page as there are several new Threat and Vulnerability links added. These are great if you are looking for specific attacks, breaches, or threats.
I found the event driven mostly by product vendors, a few assessment firms, and some footprint from the banking industry. During the time of the event and now I was able to deliver an engagement and as a result of the conference and this delivery I have the following comments.
Many assessors are using older versions of the SIG and still have not adopted 4.2.
Product vendors have incorporated many of the features and appear to be pushing the solution the most.
The current AUP and SIG are fairly decent, but the overall solution still needs to mature greatly. I found that several of the AUPs were incorrect or missing. I have yet to consolidate all my comments; however I emailed the main contact number on the site. Currently comments are submitted one by one. I don’t want to enter them one by one, thus, I haven’t submitted as I’m still waiting for a response after several weeks.
The current scoping and process for delivery is underestimated. My experience shows that you will have to set strict guidelines with the number of follow up conversations and have a cut off for evidence. Otherwise the entity that is assessed will continue to try and justify they have the appropriate controls in place.
There are plans for mapping to other compliance regulations. There are many more comments I have about this solution, but mostly I’m seeing customers use only the SIG Light or SIG level 2.
I see this as holding a place in the 3rd party assessment realm for an organization. I’m wondering! Is anyone else using the Shared Assessments? What are your thoughts? Will this solution grow and be used like PCI even though it doesn’t have the formal backing like PCI?
I guess that title should say “Can anyone clarify PCI?” or “Can we get some PCI consistency please?. I find myself in discussion day after day on topics around PCI.
What is required for web app test? Is it authenticated? Is it just a scan? Is it just my external environment? Is it only my card holder systems?
I know the council is trying to do their best with outlining the standards but there still is a serious lack of consistency across QSA’s and organizations. I found this so frustrating that I developed the cartoon below to represent my opinion.
Basically Mr. CEO here is not meeting PCI compliance and his QSA’s are all telling him something different. Even better is the new standards and enforcement that all the QSA’s themselves are trying to understand? Will any big enterprise be able to make compliance?